Video Killed the Lawsuit Star

By Jon Hyman

Mar. 14, 2016

If a picture tells a thousand words, then how many does a video tell?

Last week, the 6th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a retaliation claim based on a video of an altercation that the plaintiff claimed she had not started.

The plaintiff in Witham v. Intown Suites Louisville Northeast LLC [pdf] was a hotel general manager who claimed that her former employer fired her after she sought workers’ comp benefits for an alleged on-the-job injury. Her employer, on the other hand, claimed that it fired her after she engaged in a heated verbal exchange, followed by a physical confrontation, with a customer. Thankfully, the court did not have to engage in a he-said/she-said analysis, because the employer had the entire incident on video.

Witham’s retaliation claim fails. Even if she could establish the first requirements of a claim, she cannot show that Intown’s explanations for discharging her—supported by the video—amounted to pretext. Intown’s general counsel stated that the company fired Witham because her behavior in the video was neither “professional [n]or necessary under the circumstances.” By encouraging the man to jump onto her desk and by preventing him from leaving, Witham transformed a minor incident over a wrongly dispensed water bottle into a tense conversation and eventually into a physical confrontation, violating a number of company policies along the way. And she did all of this in front of another employee whom she was supposed to be training. The security footage bears out the hotel’s version of events, confirming Witham’s belligerent and unsafe conduct. Intown’s general counsel stated that this conduct was the only factor that went into the decision to fire Witham, noting that the executives never so much as mentioned her workers’ compensation claim.

We live in a connected world. There are security cameras everywhere. I was in Disney World last week speaking at a conference, and could not walk an inch outside my room without being recorded and surveilled. And, if it’s not an official municipal or corporate camera making the recording, it will be someone with a cell phone. Nowadays, I am much more surprised when video does not exist than when it does. As a result, more and more often, video will help decide lawsuits. The truth is out there, and increasingly video will help us locate it.

Jon Hyman is a partner in the Employment & Labor practice at Wickens Herzer Panza. Contact Hyman at

What’s New at

blog workforce

Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog


Minimum Wage by State in 2023 – All You Need to Know

Summary Twenty-three states and D.C. raised their minimum wage rates in 2023, effective January 1.  Thr...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog


New Labor Laws Taking Effect in 2023

The new year is fast approaching, and with its arrival comes a host of new labor laws that will impact ...

labor laws, minimum wage, wage and hour law

workforce blog


Wage and Hour Laws in 2022: What Employers Need to Know

Whether a mom-and-pop shop with a handful of employees or a large corporation staffing thousands, compl...

compliance, wage and hour law