Compliance

Tread Carefully if Stripping Employees of Their Pay

By Jon Hyman

Jan. 11, 2017

Stevens v. Oval Office (E.D. Wisc. 12/29/16) [hat tip: Walter Olson’s Overlawyered] poses an interesting question — is it ever permissible to dock an employee’s pay for disciplinary reasons? The fact that the plaintiffs are adult dancers docked for rule infractions such as “failing to fully remove all clothing, except for underwear, by the end of the first song when dancing on stage” doesn’t dissuade interest, either.

The Stevens court denied the employer’s motion to dismiss the class action claim, concluding that the deductions fell under the definition of “defective or faulty workmanship,” for which Wisconsin’s wage payment law prohibits pay deductions without prior written authorization (which the plaintiffs had not given).

Note that the plaintiff in Stevens filed this piece of her claim under Wisconsin state law, not under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. Indeed, the FLSA likely permits such a practice for non-exempt employees. I have grave concerns, however, as to whether it would pass muster under Ohio’s wage payment statute, which only permits paycheck deductions in certain specific circumstances, none of which on their face cover disciplinary docking.

Moreover, this practice also raises exemption issues under the FLSA. Docking an exempt employee’s pay could jeopardize one’s exempt status. The FLSA only permits an employer to disciplinarily dock an exempt employee’s pay “for penalties imposed in good faith for infractions of safety rules of major significance,” or “for unpaid disciplinary suspensions of one or more full days imposed in good faith for infractions of workplace conduct rules imposed pursuant to a written policy applicable to all employees.”

Mis-docking an exempt employee’s pay puts in doubt the exempt status of that employee and any other employees in the same job classification working for the same managers. You do not want to risk an employee’s exempt status under any circumstances, for fear of owing back overtime for any hours worked in excess of 40 for all work weeks for up to two (or even three) years. Such a mistake could prove very costly.

Employers considering docking employees as discipline for work rule violations should not do so without having their counsel draft a carefully worded document for employees to sign that explains the penalties and authorizes the deductions from their wages. Employers should also consider the effect such a program could have on employee morale and retention.

Jon Hyman is a partner at Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis in Cleveland. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Hyman’s blog at Workforce.com/PracticalEmployer.

Jon Hyman is a partner in the Employment & Labor practice at Wickens Herzer Panza. Contact Hyman at JHyman@Wickenslaw.com.

What’s New at Workforce.com?

blog workforce

Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.

Book a call
See the software
workforce news

Related Articles

workforce blog

Compliance

Minimum Wage by State in 2023 – All You Need to Know

Summary Twenty-three states and D.C. raised their minimum wage rates in 2023, effective January 1.  Thr...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog

Compliance

Exempt vs. non-exempt employees: knowing the difference

Summary Employees are exempt from FLSA requirements when they meet specific exemption criteria based on...

Department of Labor, exempt employees, Misclassification, non-exempt employees

workforce blog

Compliance

California fast food workers bill: why it’s more than meets the eye and how to prepare

Summary: California signs bill establishing a “fast food council” that has the power to raise the indus...