By Heather Jackson, Rachel Schaller
Jan. 2, 2018
Starbucks applicant Jonathan Santiago Rosario received a notification from Starbucks stating he was rejected from hiring consideration because of criminal history information contained in a third-party background investigation report.
Rosario disputed the accuracy of the information and the third-party background investigator removed it. But Starbucks did not reinstate Rosario’s job offer. Rosario brought a putative class action against Starbucks under the Fair Credit Report Act for failing to provide affected applicants with a copy of their background investigation reports and a summary of their rights under the FCRA before taking an adverse employment action.
Starbucks argued Rosario did not have an FCRA claim because he was provided a copy of his background report and an opportunity to contest the report before he received the letter notifying him that he was rejected from hiring consideration. The court rejected this argument.
Rosario successfully argued he was actually rejected when the third-party investigator “adjudicated his application for employment based on Starbucks’ hiring requirements and when Starbucks ‘adopted’ that adjudication.”
Thus, because Rosario alleged Starbucks “rubber stamped” the third-party investigator’s decision before sending Rosario notice of his rejection, the court allowed Rosario’s putative class action to proceed past the motion to dismiss stage. Rosario v. Starbucks Corp., Case No. C16-1951 RAJ, 2017 WL 4811493 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 25, 2017)
Impact: FCRA notices should contain clear and reasonable deadlines for disputing the accuracy of background investigation reports, and no final decision should be made until after the expiration of the dispute period, and consideration of information, as corrected by the third-party investigator.
Heather A. Jackson and Rachel L. Schaller are attorneys in the Employment Law Practice Group at Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, which has offices throughout the Midwest. Comment below or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.
ComplianceMinimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know
Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...
federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance
LegalCalifornia’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare
Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...
32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime
LegalA business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law
Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...
restaurants, tip laws, tipping