By Scott McIntyre
Aug. 29, 2012
Employers have long recognized the risk of retaliation claims arising from employee complaints of discriminatory practices. They are now facing another employment law challenge in the form of financial whistle-blower claims.
Under recent amendments by Congress, the anti-retaliation provisions of the federal False Claims Act have been expanded to protect not only employees but also contractors and agents of companies that do business with the federal government. In the event of retaliation, whistle-blowers may seek double or triple damages and portions of any government recovery.
Other federal laws offer protection against retaliation based upon complaints about the mismanagement of government funds or fraud involving public companies or nonpublic subsidiaries. Separate protections exist for employees in the financial services and health care industries.
And most states have their own “false claims act” laws or pending legislation that protect against retaliation when only state funds are at issue. Potential whistle-blower retaliation plaintiffs include employees of contractors providing products or services to the state or grant recipients.
In light of these increased protections and the larger pool of potential plaintiffs, employers have legitimate concerns that certain claims of financial wrongdoing may be fabricated or imagined. Courts sometimes apply an objective, good-faith standard that results in the early dismissal of bogus claims as not qualifying as protected conduct.
But employers should seriously consider all allegations of wrongdoing and proactively attempt to avoid litigation in the first instance. These goals can be achieved by, among other things, analyzing and coordinating human resources and compliance programs, making appropriate adjustments, and implementing effective training of key players.
In particular, employers should:
Human resources personnel should likewise ensure that managers appreciate the importance of documenting any legitimate performance problems before an employee or contractor raises a compliance issue. Internal complaints that ultimately result in litigation have been known to “evolve” over time. In such cases, a solid record corroborating the facts and context of the investigation is invaluable and may result in the early dismissal of retaliation claims.
Scott McIntyre is an attorney and partner in the Cincinnati office of Baker Hostetler. He is certified as a specialist in labor and employment law by the Ohio State Bar Association. To comment, email firstname.lastname@example.org.
We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.
ComplianceMinimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know
Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...
federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance
LegalCalifornia’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare
Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...
32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime
LegalA business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law
Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...
restaurants, tip laws, tipping