Legal

Courts inconsistent on orders relating to COVID-19

By Andrew S. Murphy

Jun. 30, 2020

In the spring, a political campaign committee, a real estate agent and a golf course filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate Pennsylvania’s stay-at-home order, arguing Gov. Tom Wolf exceeded his statutory authority and that the order infringed on their  constitutional rights to assemble and to equal protection.

The court upheld the order in a 4-3 decision, finding the governor had expansive emergency management powers to address the COVID-19 pandemic, including the authority to order closure of all “non-life-sustaining” businesses in the state in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Finally, the majority rejected the petitioners’ argument that the Executive Order infringed on the petitioners’ constitutional rights.

The three justices who dissented opined that the closure of all “non-life-sustaining” businesses may have exceeded Wolf’s authority. The dissenters would have given the petitioners an opportunity to develop an evidentiary record in a lower court regarding the necessity for the broad scope of the Executive Order.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the petitioners’ challenge, and Wolf subsequently replaced the challenged order with a less restrictive one. Friends of Danny DeVito v. Tom Wolf, No. 68 MM 2020 (Pa. Apr. 13, 2020) 

IMPACT: As the country continues to balance health-related restrictions and reviving the economy, affected businesses may be understandably frustrated by shifting government mandates. But as Friends of Danny DeVito demonstrates, businesses should not expect courts to relieve them of their obligation to comply.

Andrew S. Murphy is an associate at Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP in Chicago.

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Compliance

Minimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know

Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog

Legal

California’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare

Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...

32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime

workforce blog

Legal

A business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law

Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...

restaurants, tip laws, tipping