Time & Attendance
Prevent Call Outs
Implementation & Launch
By Staff Report
Nov. 29, 2012
Have you ever heard of certification harassment? Me neither, until I read Smith v. City of Niles [pdf] last week.
According to Leddrew Smith, from 2002 to 2009, the city of Niles, Michigan, asked him to provide six separate medical certifications for his 2001 back injury. Those repeated requests, per Smith, exceeded the Family and Medical Leave Act’s limits, and therefore interfered with his right to medical leave.
Here is what the 6th Circuit said about Smith’s claim:
He is right about one thing: An unreasonable demand for recertification may interfere with FMLA rights. He is wrong about another: The City’s requests all fit comfortably within the regulatory boundaries.
The FMLA has a maze of regulations that define when an employer can ask for a recertification of a serious health condition. Critical to this case is the rule that permits an employer to require a recertification any time that the “circumstances described by the previous certification have changed significantly.”
In this case, the court relied upon Smith’s changed circumstances to conclude that the city had not harassed him with its recertification requests.
In other words, following the rules does not equate to harassment. Now if we can all just figure out those annoying rules…
Written by Jon Hyman, a partner in the Labor & Employment group of Kohrman Jackson & Krantz. For more information, contact Jon at (216) 736-7226 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Schedule, engage, and pay your staff in one system with Workforce.com.
federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance
Staffing Management4 proven steps for tackling employee absenteeism
absence management, Employee scheduling software, predictive scheduling, shift bid, shift swapping
Time and Attendance8 ways to reduce overtime and labor costs
labor costs, overtime, scheduling, time tracking, work hours
Don't miss out on the latest tactics and insights at the forefront of HR.