Staffing Management

Managing Reputation Risks Key to Organization’s Success: Study

By Rodd Zolkos

Oct. 4, 2012

Events that threaten an organization’s reputation may be more common than many have previously thought, according to a new report, and a coherent strategy for managing a reputation-threatening event and rebuilding a damaged reputation can be the difference between an organization’s success and failure.

The report, “Reputation Review 2012,” prepared by Oxford Metrica and sponsored by Aon P.L.C., suggests there is an 80 percent chance of a company losing at least 20 percent of its value in any single month over a five-year period due to a reputation crisis.

“Having a robust, evidence-based reputation strategy in place will minimize the likelihood of a critical event turning into a reputation crisis and will maximize the probability of recovery,” the report said.

“Probably the first takeaway (from the study) is how prevalent reputational events are,” said Randy Nornes, executive vice president with Aon Risk Solutions in Chicago. “It’s not something that’s rare. Over five years, it’s quite likely.”

The report said essential elements of a reputational risk management program include evaluating and monitoring reputation equity, analyzing reputation drivers and developing a reputation recovery strategy.

An organization’s performance in the first few days of a reputation crisis will determine whether market perception will make it a winner or loser, and Nornes said it’s significant to note that proper preparation can actually lead to organizations’ seeing increased value after such an event.

“The other thing you take away from the report is the notion of a winner and a loser,” he said. “Management has a chance to step up” when a reputation-threatening event occurs, Nornes said, and organizations that respond successfully to such events can see their value increase.

“To me, that’s the really interesting thing,” Nornes said. “If you do the right thing, you’re not just protecting the status quo.”

The report also examines the impact that supply chain disruptions can have on companies’ reputations.

“Monitoring risk in the supply chain is an essential element of a successful reputation strategy,” the report said, adding, “reputation monitoring across the whole manufacturing chain is necessary to detect new risks as they emerge.”

The Reputation Review 2012 report is available here.

Rodd Zolkos writes for Business Insurance-Europe, a sister publication of Workforce Management. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

HR Administration

Rest and lunch break laws in every US state

Summary Federal law does not require meal or rest breaks Some states have laws requiring meal and rest ...

workforce blog

Staffing Management

What is labor forecasting?

Summary Labor forecasting helps businesses determine where, when, what kind, and how many employees are...

demand forecasting, labor forecasting, labor modeling, staffing

workforce blog

Staffing Management

How staffing agencies can better manage a remote workforce

Summary As remote work continues its rise, modern workforce management technology is being adopted – st...

remote employees, scheduling, staffing, time and attendance management