Staffing Management

Managing Reputation Risks Key to Organization’s Success: Study

By Rodd Zolkos

Oct. 4, 2012

Events that threaten an organization’s reputation may be more common than many have previously thought, according to a new report, and a coherent strategy for managing a reputation-threatening event and rebuilding a damaged reputation can be the difference between an organization’s success and failure.

The report, “Reputation Review 2012,” prepared by Oxford Metrica and sponsored by Aon P.L.C., suggests there is an 80 percent chance of a company losing at least 20 percent of its value in any single month over a five-year period due to a reputation crisis.

“Having a robust, evidence-based reputation strategy in place will minimize the likelihood of a critical event turning into a reputation crisis and will maximize the probability of recovery,” the report said.

“Probably the first takeaway (from the study) is how prevalent reputational events are,” said Randy Nornes, executive vice president with Aon Risk Solutions in Chicago. “It’s not something that’s rare. Over five years, it’s quite likely.”

The report said essential elements of a reputational risk management program include evaluating and monitoring reputation equity, analyzing reputation drivers and developing a reputation recovery strategy.

An organization’s performance in the first few days of a reputation crisis will determine whether market perception will make it a winner or loser, and Nornes said it’s significant to note that proper preparation can actually lead to organizations’ seeing increased value after such an event.

“The other thing you take away from the report is the notion of a winner and a loser,” he said. “Management has a chance to step up” when a reputation-threatening event occurs, Nornes said, and organizations that respond successfully to such events can see their value increase.

“To me, that’s the really interesting thing,” Nornes said. “If you do the right thing, you’re not just protecting the status quo.”

The report also examines the impact that supply chain disruptions can have on companies’ reputations.

“Monitoring risk in the supply chain is an essential element of a successful reputation strategy,” the report said, adding, “reputation monitoring across the whole manufacturing chain is necessary to detect new risks as they emerge.”

The Reputation Review 2012 report is available here.

Rodd Zolkos writes for Business Insurance-Europe, a sister publication of Workforce Management. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

What’s New at Workforce.com?

blog workforce

Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.

Book a call
See the software
workforce news

Related Articles

workforce blog

Staffing Management

Managing employee time-off requests: A guide for business owners

Summary Vacation, sick time, PTO banks, and unpaid leave are only a few forms of employee time off — Mo...

workforce blog

Staffing Management

4 proven steps for tackling employee absenteeism

Summary Identifying the cause of employee absenteeism not only helps uncover deeper-rooted issues — Mor...

absence management, Employee scheduling software, predictive scheduling, shift bid, shift swapping

workforce blog

Staffing Management

Employee or contractor? 6 worker misclassification FAQs

Misclassification of employees as independent contractors led to overtime violations, according to a La...

compliance, Department of Labor, employee engagement, FLSA, HR technology, Worker misclassification