Time & Attendance
By Staff Report
Aug. 25, 2014
Dear Losing Talent:
Investing in employee development is a strategic imperative for most organizations but, as with any investment, it’s not risk-free. So, how can one mitigate the risk without taking a draconian and short-sighted approach of viewing people as commodities?
There are a number of ways to develop people including internal and external training, coaching, 360-degree feedback, job expansion, promotion and tuition assistance. A common feature of many tuition assistance policies is a repayment agreement that requires an employee to remain with the company for some period of time after receiving tuition reimbursement. The contractual provision requires the individual to repay some or all of the tuition money if he or she leaves before an agreed-upon timeframe, typically two to three years. While the agreements are legally enforceable, they serve more importantly as a psychological barrier to leaving as employees don’t want to be held liable for these expenses.
However, employee development is about much more than school tuition. Here are three points worthy of consideration to maximize your return on investment:
1. Select candidates for development carefully and recognize that one size doesn’t fit all. Development is not a process to “fix” poor-performing employees. Invest more money in your top performers but don’t ignore everyone else. Tailor development to the employee’s function and level as well as individual, team and organizational needs.
2. Communicate effectively to maintain superior employee relations. While the “what” — development— is important, don’t neglect the “why.” Communicating the why is an important responsibility of the employee’s immediate supervisor. As an HR professional, your role should be to coach line managers and encourage this type of dialogue. It’s most effective if you can tie development back to career planning and allow employees to envision their future at the company as a result of the development initiatives.
3. Operate proactively. You seem progressive enough to invest in employee development, but if you’re following the above guidelines and people are still leaving, you should determine the reasons. Frequently, employees leave a supervisor rather than a company. Poor supervisors cause disengagement and turnover and may unwittingly besabotaging your company’s efforts to develop and retain high-performing people. The most important relationship in any organization is that of the employee and his or her immediate supervisor. Invest in core management skills training. It is the foundation of a great organization.
As a result of the changing relationship between employer and employee, average tenure is much lower today, particularly among millennials. There is no such thing as lifetime employment from either the employee or company perspective. However, if you communicate well, strengthen the skills of your line management and approach development in the strategic fashion outlined above, you will retain more of your best employees and enjoy greater productivity and success.
SOURCE: Jeffrey Husserl, CoralBridge Partners, Chicago, Aug. 12, 2014
Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.
Staffing ManagementManaging employee time-off requests: A guide for business owners
Summary Vacation, sick time, PTO banks, and unpaid leave are only a few forms of employee time off — Mo...
Staffing Management4 proven steps for tackling employee absenteeism
Summary Identifying the cause of employee absenteeism not only helps uncover deeper-rooted issues — Mor...
absence management, Employee scheduling software, predictive scheduling, shift bid, shift swapping
Staffing ManagementEmployee or contractor? 6 worker misclassification FAQs
Misclassification of employees as independent contractors led to overtime violations, according to a La...
compliance, Department of Labor, employee engagement, FLSA, HR technology, Worker misclassification