Legal

Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA

By James Denis

Feb. 13, 2012

Homebuilder D.R. Horton Inc. required its employees to sign an employment agreement that adjudicated legal claims by binding arbitration and waived any right to bring class-action claims.

The agreement was challenged after one of Horton’s superintendents, Michael Cuda, sought to initiate arbitration of a claim on behalf of all similarly situated superintendents nationwide, claiming that Horton had misclassified its superintendents as exempt from the overtime-pay requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act notwithstanding the U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion that says federal law pre-empts state law for class-action lawsuits.

Cuda filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board, asserting that Horton violated the federal National Labor Relations Act by interfering with his legal right to join with other employees in filing a class-action lawsuit.

In a Jan. 3 decision, the NLRB ruled that “employers may not compel employees to waive their National Labor Relations Act right to collectively pursue litigation of employment claims in all forums, arbitral and judicial.” The AT&T Mobility ruling, the NLRB reasoned, was a case about consumer class actions, whereas the Horton case involves the workplace and substantive rights granted employees under the NLRA.

Moreover, employee rights under the NLRA include the right to collective action, which included the right to a consolidated arbitration or a class action. “So long as the employer leaves open a judicial forum for class and collective claims, employees’ NLRA rights are preserved without requiring the availability of classwide arbitration. Employers remain free to insist that arbitral proceedings be conducted on an individual basis.” D.R. Horton Inc. and Michael Cuda, Case No. 12-CA-25764, (Jan. 3, 2012).

IMPACT: Since many employers require agreements with the same restrictions as Horton’s, employers should anticipate further court and agency decisions on whether class-action claims may be brought before an arbitrator.

James E. Hall, Mark T. Kobata and Marty Denis are partners in the law firm of Barlow, Kobata & Denis, with offices in Los Angeles and Chicago. To comment email editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management, February 2012, p. 8Subscribe Now!

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Compliance

Minimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know

Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog

Legal

California’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare

Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...

32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime

workforce blog

Legal

A business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law

Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...

restaurants, tip laws, tipping