Like a mounting number of executives reexamining the role ofperformance appraisal, HR professionals might like to propose an alternativestrategy for their organizations that fulfills the same purposes asappraisal-without its negative effect on employee morale and motivation. Here isa “cheat sheet” to help you frame your arguments and design aneffective initiative.
Function |
What todo Instead |
Transitioning from Appraisal |
Use a broad-based team to design alternatives based on healthy assumptions.
Separate the functions (pay, feedback, development, etc.); clarify the aim and design to accomplish that one specific purpose.
Educate everyone in the organization about the need for and direction of intended change.
|
Improving Organizational Performance |
Foster a compelling shared sense of purpose and direction for the future.
Create a work climate that trusts and respects people as responsible adults.
Train everyone to understand and apply system and process improvement methods.
|
Coaching Employees |
Encourage everyone to take responsibility for getting coaching assistance that will best serve their individual needs and the particular situation.
Provide employees and supervisors with training and elective tools that facilitate alignment, improvement, goal setting, and development.
Use appraisal format as a coaching tool only if it is the most appropriate counseling tool for the particular employee and situation.
|
Feedback |
Enlighten everyone on the value of feedback, information, and communication in improving the performance of individuals and the organization.
Train everyone in the organization to be effective receivers of feedback.
Foster a work culture where feedback is integrated into the day-to-day work.
Make available to all supervisors and employees elective feedback tools and formats.
|
Compensation |
Educate everyone on the realities of human motivation and the intended and unintended effects associated with compensation systems.
Adopt profit- or gain-sharing practices that benefit everyone when the overall organization is successful.
Foster pay practices that allow increases based on market adjustment, longevity, and maturity progressions, attainment of specific skills, reclassification, and cost of living.
Consider systems that can provide special increases or lump sums for those very rare individuals who truly stand out as exceptional performers.
Create a compensation system that is easily understood and clearly distinguishes market, cost of living, merit, and longevity.
|
Promotions/Career Advancement |
Create open promotion and career advancement systems that clearly articulate both the objective and subjective criteria.
Conduct just-in-time reference checks and use state-of-the-art interview techniques to fairly, accurately assess candidates’ potential for positions sought.
Use panels of people to screen promotion applicants and to evaluate eligibility for advancement.
|
Development |
Encourage and train people to be responsible for their own development and professional growth.
Provide access to professional development assessment and counseling tools, career counseling, and funding for training and education.
Mandate career planning and development only where there is a critical need.
|
Legal Documentation/ Helping Poor Performers |
Educate all supervisors on the origins of poor performance, the importance of good fit, and ways to work with people in need of special help.
Conduct appraisal only where legally required or prudently necessary (e.g., employees ending probationary status).
Train supervisors on the array of ways to document unacceptable performance.
Establish formal counseling and corrective action systems for poor performers.
|
Source: Tom Coens and Mary Jenkins, Abolishing Performance Appraisals: Why They Backfire And What to do Instead (Berrett-Koehler, December 2000)