Benefits

Reform Rule on Covering Adult Children Looms

By Staff Report

Sep. 9, 2010

One of the first big pieces of health care reform legislation kicks in this month, when adult children up to age 26 must be covered by employed parents’ health insurance, regardless of student status. Previously, only dependents in college typically remained on their parents’ insurance plans after age 18, unless state law mandated coverage for older children who were not in school.


“This change is effective for plan years or plans that start on or after September 23, but many new plan years won’t start until January 1,” said Sarah Bassler Millar, a partner in the employee benefits and executive compensation practice group at Philadelphia-based law firm Drinker Biddle.


Some adult children already are being covered. In April, 66 health insurers agreed to a Department of Health and Human Services request to begin early enrollment of adult dependents who would have aged out of their existing coverage between April and either September 23 or a later starting date for a parent’s employer’s 2011 plan year. The agency wanted to prevent the cost and inconvenience of dropping adult children, providing interim COBRA coverage and then re-enrolling them.


“Some insurers gave employers a choice, while others just did it,” said Tracy Watts, a principal in the health and benefits practice at Mercer, a New York-based HR consulting firm. But many “self-insured employers said no. They said they didn’t have the budget for it.”


To comply with the eligibility expansion, employers must provide written notice of a 30-day open enrollment period for employees’ adult children. This “may take employers by surprise since typical open enrollment is two weeks,” Watts said. “So they should start a little earlier.”


Although eligibility expansion seems straightforward, the definition of a child raises questions. Many firms had extended dependent status to grandchildren, nieces and nephews based on residency with an employee. “The new law doesn’t allow that,” Millar said. “Advocacy groups are asking for clarification. It’s not clear that we’ll get clarity by January 1.” 


Filed by Workforce Management contributor Bridget Mintz Testa. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Benefits

EEOC says that employers legally can offer incentives to employees to get vaccinated in almost all instances

If you’re an employer looking to get as many of your employees vaccinated as possible, you can rest eas...

ADA, CDC, COVID-19, EEOC, GINA, pandemic, vaccinated

workforce blog

Benefits

Fixing some common misconceptions about HIPAA

Ever since the CDC amended its COVID-19 guidance to say that the fully vaccinated no longer need to wea...

COVID-19, health care, HIPAA, human resources, wellness

workforce blog

Benefits

We are in the midst of a public mental health crisis; how employers can help

Do not ignore these issues or your employees who are living with them. Mental health illnesses are no d...

ADA, benefits, Coronavirus, FMLA, mental health, paid time off