Time & Attendance
By Staff Report
Aug. 16, 2011
She was the face of the failed campaign to make a Long Island, New York, store the first unionized Target in the country. Again and again she told media outlets she was struggling to raise her daughter on what she earned as a Target sales floor team member.
Now, Tashawna Green, 21, of New York City, no longer has her $8-per-hour job. A Target supervisor fired her earlier this month, seven weeks after workers voted not to join United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1500.
The union immediately filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging Green was fired “because of her activities in support of the union.”
In a letter to the board, a union lawyer wrote that Green served as an observer for the election and gave statements to the board in support of charges the union filed against Target. The lawyer wrote that Green was fired after she was seen being dropped off at work by a union representative.
In a written statement, Target said Green was fired because she “recently acted in an overly hostile, disruptive manner that is inconsistent with Target’s policies.”
Green said she was told on Aug. 5 not to report to work the next day because supervisors were investigating allegations that she had spread rumors that all staff members of Jamaican descent would be fired. (Team members who hailed from Jamaica, including Green, had been the most vocal in support of unionizing.)
Early the next morning, she got a call from a supervisor with news of her termination.
“I believe I was fired because of my participation in the union campaign,” Green said. “Because I’m for the union, they wanted to get rid of me.”
Green, who had complained of being scheduled for 20 hours or fewer a week, said she was picked on because of her age and influence on other young workers at Target. She said the firing would set her back because “I do have a 6-year-old daughter to take care of.”
Alvin Blyer, regional director of the labor board, said his office received the charge and is investigating. He said the labor board planned to rule soon on dozens of other unfair labor practice allegations brought both by the union and by Target.
Local 1500 issued a formal challenge to the election, alleging workers were bribed and intimidated into voting against the union, and is seeking a rerun election. And late last month, Target filed charges of its own, contending union representatives threatened and physically assaulted employees as they continued to seek support after the election loss.
All Target stores are nonunion.
Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.
ComplianceMinimum Wage by State in 2023 – All You Need to Know
Summary Twenty-three states and D.C. raised their minimum wage rates in 2023, effective January 1. Thr...
federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance
HR AdministrationIs your employee attendance policy and procedure fit for purpose?
Summary: Lateness and absenteeism are early warning signs of a deteriorating attendance policy. — More ...
compliance, HR technology, human resources
HR AdministrationClawback provisions: A safety net against employee fraud losses
Summary Clawback provisions are usually included as clauses in employee contracts and are used to recou...
clawback provisions, human resources, policy