Workplace Culture

Ministerial Exception’ Exempts Religious Employers

By James Denis

Aug. 13, 2012

IMPACT: Federal, state and local employment discrimination laws may not apply to religious institutions and their employees who play some role in disseminating the employer’s religious message.

Cheryl Perich was a teacher at Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School. Although her job duties mostly included teaching nonreligious subjects, she also taught a religion course, attended chapel and led her class in prayer.

In 2004, Perich became ill. When she was cleared to return to work, the school determined that her health did not permit her to return, hired a replacement and told her to resign.

Perich threatened to sue the school, claiming that the school violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. Perich was fired and told that her threat to sue violated a Lutheran religious tenet that members of the faith should internally resolve their arguments. Perich filed charges with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claiming retaliation under the ADA, and the EEOC sued the school.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan ruled that Perich’s claim was barred by the “ministerial exception” to federal workplace discrimination law. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit reversed, holding that while there is such an exception, Perich was not a “minister” because she was not primarily involved in teaching the employer’s religious faith and had no role in church governance.

The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the 6th Circuit’s ruling and held that it is “impermissible for the government to contradict a church’s determination of who can act as its ministers.”

The court said that “requiring a church to accept or retain an unwanted minister, or punishing a church for failing to do so, intrudes upon more than a mere employment decision. Such action interferes with the internal governance of the church, depriving the church of control over the selection of those who will personify its beliefs.” Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC 10-553 (Jan. 11, 2012).

James E. Hall, Mark T. Kobata and Marty Denis are partners in the law firm of Barlow, Kobata & Denis, with offices in Los Angeles and Chicago. Comment below or email

Workforce Management, August 2012, p. 12Subscribe Now!


blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Workplace Culture

5 lunch break statistics that shed light on American work culture

Summary Research shows how taking lunch breaks enhances employee engagement and productivity. Despite t...

lunch breaks, scheduling, statistics

workforce blog

Workplace Culture

6 Things Leadership can do to Prevent Nurse Burnout

Summary Nurse burnout is a serious issue in the healthcare business and has several negative consequenc...

burnout, Healthcare, hospitals, nurses

workforce blog

Workplace Culture

5 tips to reduce employee no call, no shows

Summary No call, no shows are damaging to businesses. High no call, no show rates could suggest problem...

absence, attendance, no call, no shows, time