HR Administration

Michigan Unions Sue to Halt Mandated DB-or-DC Choice

By Kevin Olsen

Feb. 15, 2012

A Michigan law requiring state employees to either contribute 4% of pay to the $9.1 billion Michigan State Employees’ Retirement System or join a defined contribution plan is unconstitutional because the state Legislature overstepped its authority in passing the law, according to a lawsuit seeking class-action status filed Monday by a coalition of unions.

According to the lawsuit, filed in Ingham County Court in Lansing, the Michigan Civil Service Commission “regulates the terms and conditions of employment of state employees and has plenary and absolute authority in that respect.”

Under the measure, signed by Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder in December, state workers must pay 4 percent of pay to remain in the defined benefit plan, with the additional money used to fund the pension liability. If workers opt not to contribute, they would leave the DB plan with their pension level frozen and have to enter into an existing defined contribution plan.

Last year, the unions won a similar case after the Legislature passed a bill requiring a mandatory 3 percent contribution toward retiree health care.

The coalition consists of Service Employees International Union Local 517M, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 25, Michigan Corrections Organization SEIU, Michigan State Employees Assn., and the International United Auto Workers Local 6000, which represents some state employees.

The full lawsuit is available on the website of SEIU Local 517M.

Kevin Olsen writes for Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

What’s New at Workforce.com?

blog workforce

Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Compliance

Minimum Wage by State in 2023 – All You Need to Know

Summary Twenty-three states and D.C. raised their minimum wage rates in 2023, effective January 1.  Thr...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog

HR Administration

Is your employee attendance policy and procedure fit for purpose?

Summary: Lateness and absenteeism are early warning signs of a deteriorating attendance policy. — More ...

compliance, HR technology, human resources

workforce blog

HR Administration

Clawback provisions: A safety net against employee fraud losses

Summary Clawback provisions are usually included as clauses in employee contracts and are used to recou...

clawback provisions, human resources, policy