Scheduling
Time & Attendance
Forecasting
Employee App
Payroll Integrations
Communications
Workplace Culture
By Staff Report
May. 1, 2012
Dear Personality Flaws:
First, this issue is not isolated to personality tests and is a legitimate concern with respect to any tool used in the hiring process. That includes interviews, application blanks, consumer reports and assessments.
Moreover, an employer should not be placing reliance on any hiring tool that has not been professionally developed and is not job-related and consistent with business necessity.
Professionally developed personality tests typically do not exhibit disparate impact on the basis of an applicant’s race or gender. Most employers utilize a variety of hiring tools to help maximize the likelihood that they are hiring people who will be productive workers. From administrative, operational and cost perspectives, employers are not able to have all applicants participate in every step of the hiring process.
Applicants typically go through a multiple-hurdle process, whereby they don’t progress to the next step in the hiring cycle if they are not successful at the current step. Minimum qualifications, personality testing, consumer reports, initial interviews, interviews by hiring managers and drug testing are common hurdles. Employers expect job applicants to clear them before progressing to further steps in the hiring process.
Typically, the cost of a particular tool determines where it is placed in the hiring process. Expensive tools, such as consumer reports and drug testing, are placed at the end. Requiring candidates to successfully clear the job-based requirements set for each hurdle is not only standardized, objective and legal, but it also saves the organization time and money and maximizes the chances of hiring the “right” job applicant.
Also important to note: If your organization creates exceptions or allows subjectivity to sway its standard rules regarding each hurdle, it could create a perception of unequal treatment and associated liabilities.
Once a pool of individuals successfully completes the hiring process, it is often useful to rank them from most competitive to least competitive, using all of the information that has been gathered. In this step, the relative “job-relatedness” of each hiring tool should determine how much weight is placed on it in making the hiring decision. Personality tests are commonly weighted moderately to heavily, due to their documented effectiveness at predicting job-related behavior.
SOURCE: David W. Arnold, Wonderlic, Vernon Hills, Illinois
LEARN MORE: Especially amid recession, employers that routinely screen for credit and criminal records should take extra caution to sidestep legal trouble.
The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.
Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.
Workplace Culture
Workplace productivity statistics and trends you need to knowSummary There was a 2.4% decrease in productivity in Q2 2022 – the largest decline since the U.S. Burea...
productivity, statistics, trends, workplace
Workplace Culture
5 lunch break statistics that shed light on American work cultureSummary Research shows how taking lunch breaks enhances employee engagement and productivity. Despite t...
lunch breaks, scheduling, statistics
Workplace Culture
6 Things Leadership can do to Prevent Nurse BurnoutSummary Nurse burnout is a serious issue in the healthcare business and has several negative consequenc...
burnout, Healthcare, hospitals, nurses