Benefits

Employers Undecided on Health Plan Future After 2014

By Staff Report

Mar. 11, 2011

Most employers have yet to decide whether they will continue to offer health care coverage in 2014 when the “play-or-pay” provision of the health reform law goes into effect, the head of a benefits brokerage and consulting firm said March 10.


At the moment, clients are sitting on the fence, J. Michael Brewer, president of Kansas City, Missouri-based Lockton Benefit Group, told a House Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions Subcommittee hearing.


“The majority of our clients tell us they will wait and see. What they will do in 2014 depends on their health insurance costs and budget in 2014 and their perceived need to use a health plan to gain a competitive advantage for labor,” Brewer said.


Clients are saying, “We won’t be the first to drop coverage, but we won’t wait to be third either,” he said.


Starting in 2014, employers with at least 50 employees who drop coverage will pay an annual assessment of $2,000 per full-time employee, excluding the first 30 employees.


Individuals who make as much as 400 percent of the federal poverty level ($89,400 for a family of four) will be eligible for federal premium subsidies for policies they purchase from insurers offering coverage through exchanges that states are required to set up by 2014.


That $2,000 penalty is a fraction of what employers pay for coverage. Lockton calculates if employers were to terminate group coverage, they would save an amount equal to 44 percent of their projected 2014 health insurance costs on average. But that percentage excludes any extra money employers decide to provide to employees to help offset the cost of coverage they would purchase through state exchanges.


Brewer predicted that smaller employers will be the first to abandon coverage. At a recent Lockton presentation to about 200 employers with workforces ranging from 50 to 150 employees, half said they intend to exit the group health care market in 2014, he said.


The hearing was called to examine how the health care law has affected costs.  


Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


 


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Benefits

EEOC says that employers legally can offer incentives to employees to get vaccinated in almost all instances

If you’re an employer looking to get as many of your employees vaccinated as possible, you can rest eas...

ADA, CDC, COVID-19, EEOC, GINA, pandemic, vaccinated

workforce blog

Benefits

Fixing some common misconceptions about HIPAA

Ever since the CDC amended its COVID-19 guidance to say that the fully vaccinated no longer need to wea...

COVID-19, health care, HIPAA, human resources, wellness

workforce blog

Benefits

We are in the midst of a public mental health crisis; how employers can help

Do not ignore these issues or your employees who are living with them. Mental health illnesses are no d...

ADA, benefits, Coronavirus, FMLA, mental health, paid time off