Legal

Employer Can’t Compel Employee to Arbitrate Claim

By Mark Kobata

Oct. 2, 2017

Ritarose Capili was a sales associate at a Finish Line store in California. When she was hired in August 2013, she was required to sign an agreement that required her to arbitrate employment-related disputes with Finish Line.

In mid-2014, after she was diagnosed with diabetes and anxiety that was exacerbated by sleeping issues that occurred during her pregnancy, Capili requested a leave. She was terminated July 8, 2014. Capili sued Finish Line claiming that she was fired because of her pregnancy and because she tried to exercise her legal right to take leave under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, and that she wasn’t given a reasonable accommodation for medical conditions related to her pregnancy. When Finish Line moved to compel the case to arbitration, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that the arbitration agreement was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable.

The Ninth Circuit appellate court agreed. The Court held that the agreement was procedurally unconscionable because it was “adhesive” in that it was offered “on essentially a ‘take it or leave it’ basis.” They further held it was substantively unconscionable because its cost sharing provision “imposes substantial nonrecoverable costs on low-level employees just to get in the door, effectively foreclosing vindication of employees’ rights” and because it contained judicial carve-outs that allowed Finish Line, but not Capili, to seek judicial resolution of certain specified claims.

Capili v. The Finish Line Inc., Case No. 15-16657 (9th Cir. July 3, 2017).

Impact: The courts place significant restrictions on the enforceability of arbitration agreements so they do not effectively prohibit the employee from enforcing their rights.

Mark T. Kobata and Marty Denis are partners at the law firm Barlow, Kobata and Denis, which has offices in Beverly Hills, California, and Chicago. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Mark Kobata and Marty Denis are partners at the law firm Barlow, Kobata and Denis, which has offices in Beverly Hills, California, and Chicago.

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Compliance

Minimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know

Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog

Legal

California’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare

Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...

32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime

workforce blog

Legal

A business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law

Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...

restaurants, tip laws, tipping