Legal

EEOC Is Now an Open Book for Employees, Grants Access to Employer Position Statements

By Jon Hyman

Feb. 23, 2016

Back in the day, if an employee wanted to obtain a copy of an employer’s EEOC position statement, the employee had to go through a process under the federal Freedom of Information Act. For starters, the employee had to wait until after the EEOC issued a right to sue letter, and the EEOC could deny the request for a variety of reasons.

By back in the day … I mean last week. Because, last week, the EEOC implemented a huge policy change, which provides for the release of an employer’s position statements and non-confidential attachments to an employee, upon request, during the investigation of a charge of discrimination. Employees or their representatives must request the document. The agency will not automatically turn it over. But, employees avoid the formality of the FOIA-request process. FOIA, on the other hand, still governs employers’ requests for copies of employees’ submissions (How is that fair?).

Make no mistake, this policy really is huge. Why? Because the EEOC position statement is an employer’s first chance to tell its side of the story, and the semi-automatic provision of these documents to employees and their lawyers places a hyper-premium on accuracy.

One of the ways for an employee to win a discrimination case is to establish pretext — that the employer’s stated reason for the termination or other adverse action was a cover for a discriminatory motive. Among other avenues, an employee can establish pretext by showing shifting rationales. Thus, for example, if a position statement says one thing, and an internal company document says another, you have pretext (or at least enough of a cloud to get the issue to a jury). With the proliferation of communication via email, instant messages, other e-tools, it often doesn’t take much to uncover moving reasons for a decision.

You can assume that, moving forward, employees will request and receive copies of position statements in every case. This policy change is a good reminder for employers to make sure your investigations are thorough and complete before filing an EEOC position statement, and that you are accurate and consistent in your message from termination (or other adverse action) through litigation.

Jon Hyman is a partner in the Employment & Labor practice at Wickens Herzer Panza. Contact Hyman at JHyman@Wickenslaw.com.

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Compliance

Minimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know

Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog

Legal

California’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare

Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...

32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime

workforce blog

Legal

A business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law

Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...

restaurants, tip laws, tipping