EEOC Clarifies ADEA Obligations

By James Denis

Apr. 16, 2010

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has published a notice of proposed rulemaking giving meaning to the “reasonable factors other than age” defense in the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

The proposed rule follows two decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court: Smith v. Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005), in which the court held that an employment practice that has a disparate impact on older workers is discriminatory unless it is justified by a reasonable factor other than age; and Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., 128 S. Ct. 2395 (2008), which held that the employer bears the burden of proving the defense of reasonable factors other than age.

Because neither decision fully explained the meaning of “reasonable factors other than age,” the EEOC proposed rules to explain that “a reasonable factor is one that is objectively reasonable when viewed from the position of a reasonable employer under like circumstances.” Consistent with Smith, the proposed rule provides that an employer asserting the defense must show its employment practice was reasonably designed to further a legitimate business purpose and administered to achieve that purpose.

The proposed rule also explains that the defense of reasonable factors other than age is applicable where the challenged practice is not based on age. It also offers guidance for employers by providing a non-exhaustive list of factors relevant to determining whether an employment practice is “reasonable” and whether it is based on a factor “other than age” such as job performance, skill sets or the employee’s ability to perform a variety of tasks.

The EEOC’s proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on February 18, triggering a 60-day public comment period, after which the EEOC will review the comments before issuing a final rule. Text of the EEOC’s proposed rule can be accessed at laws/regulations/index.cfm.

Impact: Employers are urged to review the EEOC’s proposed rules before changing or applying practices and policies that may affect an employee older than 40.

Workforce Management, April 10, p. 8Subscribe Now!

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.


blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog


Minimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know

Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog


California’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare

Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...

32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime

workforce blog


A business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law

Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...

restaurants, tip laws, tipping