Time & Attendance
By Vinh Duong
Sep. 6, 2011
Traditionally a federal responsibility, immigration reform has become a hot-button topic for state lawmakers across the United States.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in the first quarter of 2011, state legislators in the 50 states and Puerto Rico introduced 1,538 immigration-related bills and resolutions. This surpassed the first quarter of 2010, when 1,180 bills were introduced.
In particular, state legislatures continue to pass legislation aimed at curtailing the hiring of undocumented workers by requiring employers to utilize the E-Verify program. E-Verify is a Web-based system operated by the Department of Homeland Security that allows employers to determine whether their employees are eligible to work in the United States.
E-Verify is voluntary for all employers, although a growing list of states have passed laws requiring businesses to participate and mandating its use by public employers. Indeed, thus far in 2011, eight states have enacted legislation requiring employers to enroll and participate in E-Verify, including Alabama, Florida (by executive order), Georgia, Indiana, North Carolina, Tennessee, Utah and Virginia.
Currently, 18 states have laws requiring employers to enroll and participate in E-Verify. The linked table below provides a snapshot of states requiring participation in E-Verify.
For multistate employers, the growing patchwork of state immigration laws requiring participation in E-Verify, coupled with the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding a state’s right to require mandatory use of E-Verify, means that those employers must align their work-site compliance strategy with both the applicable state immigration laws currently in effect in the state(s) in which they operate, as well as with federal immigration laws.
E-Verify was conceived with the intent of curtailing the hiring of undocumented workers. As of January 2011, over 243,000 employers have registered to use it. Although E-Verify has grown in popularity over the years, the program is not without its flaws.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services reported in fiscal 2010 that 98.3 percent of all queries submitted to E-Verify resulted in confirmations with 24 hours. Despite the quick turnaround on queries, the accuracy and reliability of the program remains divisive for a number of reasons.
Despite its flaws, proponents of E-Verify maintain that the program is the most effective tool currently available to protect U.S. workers from businesses that hire undocumented foreign workers. To be sure, some of the advantages of participating in E-Verify are that the program:
There is a growing movement at the federal level to require all U.S. employers to enroll and participate in E-Verify and eliminate the I-9 employment verification process. Such a bill, the Legal Workforce Act of 2011, was introduced in Congress on June 4. Its effectiveness for U.S. businesses remains open for debate, but the likelihood is that proponents of E-Verify, both in state and federal governments, will continue to push the E-Verify agenda and lay the groundwork for making E-Verify mandatory.
As state legislatures continue to enact E-Verify legislation, employers should expect that more and more states will be encouraged to pass laws regulating the hiring of undocumented workers and mandating the use of E-Verify, thereby imposing additional compliance burdens on employers operating in multiple states.
Between the one-two punch of federal and state immigration laws, employers will face the daunting task of trying to comply with the growing patchwork of laws aimed at curbing illegal immigration.
Workforce Management Online, September 2011 — Register Now!
Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.
ComplianceMinimum Wage by State in 2023 – All You Need to Know
Summary Twenty-three states and D.C. raised their minimum wage rates in 2023, effective January 1. Thr...
federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance
HR AdministrationIs your employee attendance policy and procedure fit for purpose?
Summary: Lateness and absenteeism are early warning signs of a deteriorating attendance policy. — More ...
compliance, HR technology, human resources
HR AdministrationClawback provisions: A safety net against employee fraud losses
Summary Clawback provisions are usually included as clauses in employee contracts and are used to recou...
clawback provisions, human resources, policy