Bill Would Extend COBRA, Provide Pension Funding Relief

By Staff Report

May. 20, 2010

Federal COBRA premium subsidies would be extended through year-end and employers would have more time to fund their pension liabilities under a tax bill that the House could vote on this week.

Under the measure—proposed by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Montana, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Sander Levin, D-Michigan—the 65 percent, 15-month COBRA premium subsidy would be extended to involuntarily terminated employees through the end of the year.

Without congressional action, employees who lose their jobs after May 31 will not be eligible for the subsidy.
The measure, H.R. 4213, also would give employers more time to fund pension plan shortfalls.

Under current law, employers must amortize funding shortfalls over seven years. The proposed American Workers, State and Business Relief Act of 2010 would give employers two alternatives to that schedule.

Under one alternative, employers could amortize funding shortfalls over 15 years for any two plan years between 2008 and 2011.

Under the second alternative, employers would have to pay interest on a funding shortfall for only two of the plan years they choose. After that, the seven-year amortization period would begin.

For example, if an employer chose the latter approach for the 2010 plan year, it would pay interest on the shortfall in 2010 and 2011. Then the shortfall would be amortized over seven years starting in 2012.

Other provisions in the bill, though, would require employers that use either temporary funding schedule to contribute more to their plans if they paid “excessive” employee compensation or shareholder payments. A summary of the actual legislation, which was not immediately available, does not define excessive.

Under a previous version of the legislation, an amount equal to compensation that is in excess of $1 million paid to any employee would have to be paid to the pension plan. If an employer had 10 employees who each made $1.5 million, the employer would have to contribute an extra $5 million to the plan.

The House could vote on the bill this week and the Senate could vote on the plan next week.

Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.


What’s New at

blog workforce

Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog


What is Earned Wage Access (EWA)? A Few Considerations

Summary Earned wage access (EWA) programs are an increasingly popular way for employees to access their...

benefits, earned wage access products, payroll, time and attendance

workforce blog


EEOC says that employers legally can offer incentives to employees to get vaccinated in almost all instances

If you’re an employer looking to get as many of your employees vaccinated as possible, you can rest eas...

ADA, CDC, COVID-19, EEOC, GINA, pandemic, vaccinated

workforce blog


Fixing some common misconceptions about HIPAA

Ever since the CDC amended its COVID-19 guidance to say that the fully vaccinated no longer need to wea...

COVID-19, health care, HIPAA, human resources, wellness