Walgreen Suit Reflects EEOC’S Latest Strategies

By Staff Report

Sep. 16, 2011

 Almost one year ago, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission launched an initiative to target systemic discrimination by pursuing pattern and practice cases and class actions.

In February, the agency indicated that racial discrimination is likely to be a primary focus of that effort by introducing a campaign called “Eradicating Racism and Colorism from Employment.”

On March 7, the two elements were highlighted when the EEOC filed a class-action employment discrimination lawsuit against Walgreen Co., accusing the drug retailer of racial discrimination.

The EEOC alleges that Walgreen uses race as a factor to place managers and pharmacists in low-performing stores and in locations in African-American communities. The company denies the charges.

Although the racism initiative, which emphasizes public education and outreach, is not directly tied to the Walgreen action, the EEOC is making an example of the company.

“Certainly it reflects our commitment to looking at race and color discrimination on a nationwide basis,” said Elizabeth Bille, EEOC special assistant and counsel, after addressing a Society for Human Resource Management conference in Washington on March 12.

The EEOC has been intensifying its campaign against racial discrimination for a while, says Lynn Lieber, an employment lawyer and CEO of Workplace Answers, a consulting firm.

In April 2006, the EEOC issued guidelines for employers that warned against subtle forms of bias, such as a boss not inviting minority workers to an office lunch or a happy hour. This kind of exclusion undermines networking opportunities. It also urges companies to expand their recruiting efforts to include nontraditional sources of talent and not to rely solely on word-of-mouth referrals.

“They were very, very broad,” Lieber says of the EEOC guidelines. “The EEOC is very serious about race and color.”

It also is intent on promoting class-action cases. Lieber says courts have become more inclined to certify class actions, a trend that could cost employers. A national chain, for instance, would want a case to focus on bias at individual stores rather than having it include every African-American employee nationwide.

The damage awards in a class action can total billions of dollars.

“It could really force a company to go under,” Lieber says.

Mark Schoeff Jr.


blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog


Minimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know

Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog


California’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare

Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...

32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime

workforce blog


A business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law

Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...

restaurants, tip laws, tipping