Archive

Survey Finds Tax on Costly Health Care Plans Would Reduce Employer-Provided Benefits

By Staff Report

Dec. 4, 2009


Nearly two-thirds of employers say they would reduce health care benefits if Congress passes health care reform legislation that would impose a tax on costly health insurance plans, according to a survey released Thursday, December 3.


The legislation under consideration on the Senate floor would impose a 40 percent excise tax on health insurance premiums exceeding $8,500 for individual coverage and $23,000 for family coverage, starting in 2013.


The cost threshold triggering the tax would be somewhat higher for plans covering early retirees and employees in certain “high-risk” industries. The tax would be paid by insurers and third-party administrators, but the cost surely would be passed back to employers, benefits experts say.


And that is something many affected employers want to avoid.


According to the Mercer survey of 465 health plan sponsors, 63 percent of respondents said they would cut benefits to reduce costs so as not to hit the cost threshold triggering the tax.


On the other hand, 23 percent of respondents said they would maintain their plans and share the cost of the tax with employees. Just 2 percent of employers said they would fully absorb the cost of the tax.


Among employers saying they would reduce benefits, a significant majority—75 percent—said they would increase deductibles and co-payments.


Additionally, 40 percent said they would add a new low-cost plan as an alternative to their costly plan, 32 percent said they would replace their plan with a low-cost plan, and 19 percent said they would terminate their contributions to flexible spending accounts, health savings accounts and health reimbursement arrangements.


Mercer previously estimated that about 20 percent of employers offer health care plans, which, if not changed, would be subject to the excise tax.


The survey also found that employer attitudes on a key provision in the legislation—imposing a financial penalty on individuals who do not enroll in a health care plan—vary significantly by company size.


For example, 65 percent of employers with at least 5,000 employees are in favor of an individual mandate. That compares with 45 percent of employers with fewer than 500 employees, and 47 percent of employers with 500 to 4,999 employees.





Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.


About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Employee Engagement

12 practical employee appreciation ideas for better engagement and retention

Summary Showing appreciation to your employees improves engagement and retention. There are 12 practica...

employee appreciation, engagement, HR, raccoons

workforce blog

Compliance

California fast food workers bill: why it’s more than meets the eye and how to prepare

Summary: California signs bill establishing a “fast food council” that has the power to raise the indus...

workforce blog

Employee Engagement

7 statistics on employee turnover in 2022 every HR manager should be aware of

Summary July 2022 saw 5.9 million total separations – More Replacing a full-time employee can cost up t...

employee retention, employee turnover