Compliance

Should We Require Employees Who Leave to Repay Tuition?

By Staff Report

Jun. 6, 2012

Dear Feeling Cheated:

 

It’s important to remember that you don’t have complete control over this situation, in that employees will adjust to your decision in ways you might not like. If you get too cheap—paying only part of the tuition costs, requiring a very long payback period—employees won’t use it. Those with resources will pay for it themselves and then leave immediately after.

Most companies now require that tuition-reimbursement costs be paid back when the employee leaves. At least at the Master of Business Administration level, the requirement has been about two years of subsequent service.

It’s useful to ask what problem you are trying to solve by imposing these restrictions. Employees who attend school while also working full time tend to be highly motivated, so the best workers are likely to be the ones using the benefit. They tend to take courses or degrees that improve their performance, which is exactly what you want, and they are making the bigger investment by doing all the work on their own time. We know that they also tend to stay with employers longer than those who don’t use the programs. It’s a great win for the employer. So do you really want to make it more difficult for your employees to use tuition reimbursement?

If the concern is losing investments in people who leave after getting an education, remember: It was only partially on your dime. Second, the overwhelming reason people leave is they have acquired new skills—but often leave because their employer won’t give them jobs or even tasks that use those skills. That is an aspect firmly within your control.

Contracts that require payback don’t keep people from leaving. But if the employee leaves, thus breaking the contract, his new employer pays off the debt.

SOURCE: Peter Cappelli, Center for Human Resources, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

LEARN MORE: Tuition assistance benefits typically have not been assessed for their bottom-line effect. But some see the programs as vital to employee development and retention.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

What’s New at Workforce.com?

blog workforce

Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Compliance

Minimum Wage by State in 2023 – All You Need to Know

Summary Twenty-three states and D.C. raised their minimum wage rates in 2023, effective January 1.  Thr...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog

Compliance

Exempt vs. non-exempt employees: knowing the difference

Summary Employees are exempt from FLSA requirements when they meet specific exemption criteria based on...

Department of Labor, exempt employees, Misclassification, non-exempt employees

workforce blog

Compliance

California fast food workers bill: why it’s more than meets the eye and how to prepare

Summary: California signs bill establishing a “fast food council” that has the power to raise the indus...