Legal

Senate Finance Committee Likely to Favor ‘Co-Op Groups’ Over Public Health Care Plan

By Staff Report

Jul. 28, 2009


Legislation expected to emerge from the Senate Finance Committee likely won’t include two key planks of a Democrat-backed platform to overhaul the U.S. health care system—a public health plan and a requirement that employers offer insurance.


Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, emerging from a closed-door meeting of Senate negotiators, said that the committee is strongly leaning against mandating employer-sponsored coverage and establishing “co-op” buying groups in place of a public health plan option.


Snowe and other senators on Monday, July 27, continued to suggest that nothing is final as the committee heads into the heavy lifting of figuring out how to finance such a package, which likely will near $1 trillion over the next decade.


“But the co-op is one of the more prominent options, it’s been fully explored,” she said. “It’s safe to say that it probably is going to remain in the final document.”


Snowe said that rather than force employers to offer health benefits to their workers, the so-called “free rider” initiative has become the favored option. Under the proposal, employers would be required to pay a certain amount if their workers were on Medicaid or got their insurance from the health insurance exchange.


“We still have various options on the table,” she said, but added: “We don’t mandate employer coverage, at least in some of the initial proposals.”


On Monday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs provided details to statements made by administration officials that there is agreement on a solid majority of a health care bill, citing cost savings and increased access to care as just two examples.


Gibbs said “there is broad agreement” that a bill to overhaul the health care system should not add to the national debt and should reduce costs over the long haul and require health plans to accept everyone regardless of whether they are sick.


Even so, two bills to emerge from Capitol Hill include a public option and employer mandate.


The Finance Committee package likely will be in direct odds with those other plans. That sets the stage for what could be a messy melding period, where all three packages will have to merge into one. Senior White House advisor David Axelrod over the weekend said on the television program Face the Nation that there is agreement on 80 percent of a legislative package.


“Everybody I think wants to get something done, and now we are at that final 20 percent,” he said. “We are trying to work through those details.”



Filed by Matthew DoBias of Modern Healthcare, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com


Workforce Management’s online news feed is now available via Twitter


About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Compliance

Minimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know

Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog

Legal

California’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare

Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...

32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime

workforce blog

Legal

A business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law

Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...

restaurants, tip laws, tipping