Archive
By Staff Report
Jun. 14, 2000
Q
Dear Workforce:
The organization I work for has 700 job titles for 3200 employees and a lot of salary ranges. The problem is that the title is so important that new titles are created all the time, and jobs aren’t always evaluated (no job description) since the managers don’t consult HR.
At the Compensation department, we want to reduce the number of titles ( since a lot a employees do practically the same job but don’t have the same title), as well as reduce the numbers of salary ranges and implement a new evaluation system, since it’s hard to manage the internal/external equity.
The problem is that we have to find ways to convince the Compensation Committee that such a change is necessary; in the past it as never been accepted.
— Valerie Palma, Compensation Analyst, Laurentian Bank, Montréal, Canada
A Dear Valerie:
Reducing the number of classifications and salary ranges will allow human resource professionals to reallocate their time to serve as a business partner in a more contemporary manner. The following are benefits of reducing the number of job classifications:
Implementing a compensation program that limits the number of job titles and salary ranges will provide the organization with the following additional benefits.
SOURCE: Brian Shay, a compensation consultant with the Global Human Resource Solutions practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Shay specializes in salary administration, incentive design and executive compensation related services.
E-mail your Dear Workforce questions to Online Editor Todd Raphael at raphaelt@workforceonline.com, along with your name, title, organization and location. Unless you state otherwise, your identifying info may be used on Workforce.com and in Workforce magazine. We can’t guarantee we’ll be able to answer every question.
Schedule, engage, and pay your staff in one system with Workforce.com.