Benefits

Employers Expect Health Reform Law to Boost Costs

By Staff Report

May. 20, 2010

One-quarter of employers expect the requirements that group health care plans extend coverage to employees’ adult children up to age 26 and that they eliminate lifetime dollar limits will increase plan costs at least 3 percent, according to a survey released Thursday, May 20.


The provisions, which generally go into effect in 2011, are among the first plan changes required under the new health care reform law.


Thirteen percent of employers responding to the Mercer survey expect the adult-child and dollar-limit provisions to boost costs by 3 to 4 percent, while 12 percent expect cost increases of at least 5 percent.


On the other hand, many employers expect a more modest impact: Thirteen percent expect cost increases of less than 1 percent, while 28 percent estimate cost increases of 1 to 2 percent.


Thirty percent say they don’t yet know how much costs will increase as a result of complying with the new coverage mandates, according to the Mercer study.


Demographics are a key factor in why costs will vary, said Tracy Watts, a partner in Mercer’s Washington office. For example, employers with young workforces likely would have few employees with young-adult children, but employers with a high number of employees ages 45 to 60 likely would have many young-adult children.


In the wake of the new requirements, some employers already are considering changes to their premium structures. For example, 20 percent said they will strongly consider changing their premium rate tiers. Many employers now have only two or three premium tiers.


In addition, 16 percent are strongly considering boosting the premium share for dependent coverage. Nearly half are strongly considering requiring children above a specified age to certify that no other coverage is available. Under the health care reform law, the adult-child coverage requirement does not apply until January 1, 2014, if the adult child is eligible to enroll in another employer plan.


Twenty-nine percent of respondents said a new 40 percent excise tax on the most costly plans is the reform provision that worries them most. Under the provision that is slated to begin in 2018, a 40 percent excise tax will be imposed on premiums exceeding $10,200 for single coverage and $27,500 for family coverage.


The tax poses a difficult issue for employers with generous plans, Watts said. If they pare coverage, employers will lose a tool that has provided a recruiting edge; but if they make no changes, employers face additional costs.


The survey is based on the responses of 791 employers.


 

Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

 

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Benefits

EEOC says that employers legally can offer incentives to employees to get vaccinated in almost all instances

If you’re an employer looking to get as many of your employees vaccinated as possible, you can rest eas...

ADA, CDC, COVID-19, EEOC, GINA, pandemic, vaccinated

workforce blog

Benefits

Fixing some common misconceptions about HIPAA

Ever since the CDC amended its COVID-19 guidance to say that the fully vaccinated no longer need to wea...

COVID-19, health care, HIPAA, human resources, wellness

workforce blog

Benefits

We are in the midst of a public mental health crisis; how employers can help

Do not ignore these issues or your employees who are living with them. Mental health illnesses are no d...

ADA, benefits, Coronavirus, FMLA, mental health, paid time off