Disabilities Protections Expanded

By James Denis

Nov. 5, 2010

Sam Hoffman, a service technician for Advanced Healthcare, was diagnosed with stage 3 renal cancer and had his left kidney removed.

More than a year later, Advanced Healthcare told all of its service technicians, including Hoffman, they would have to start working 65 to 70 hours a week, instead of the previous 40 hours.

Although his cancer was in remission, Hoffman gave the company a doctor’s note limiting him to a 40-hour schedule. Advanced Healthcare agreed to a 40-hour schedule but told him he would have to work out of the company’s Fort Wayne, Indiana, office rather than his Angola, Indiana, home. Hoffman, citing two to three hours of commute time that would be added to his day, refused and never returned to work.

Hoffman sued the company under the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended by the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act, claiming the company failed to accommodate his disability and fired him because he was disabled or regarded as disabled.

In one of the first cases of its kind to reach the summary judgment phase since the ADA Amendments Act became effective on Jan. 1, 2009, the Northern District of Indiana court in Fort Wayne found that Hoffman’s claims could proceed to trial even though his cancer was in remission. Holding that “although the ADAAA left the ADA’s three-category definition of ‘disability’ intact, significant changes were made to how the categories are to be interpreted. … Moreover, the ADAAA very clearly provides that an impairment that is episodic or in remission is a disability if it would substantially limit a major life activity when active.” Therefore, Hoffman didn’t have to show that he was substantially limited in a major life activity at the actual time of the alleged adverse employment action. Hoffman v. Carefirst of Fort Wayne Inc. d/b/a Advanced Healthcare, N.D. Ind., No. 1:09-cv-00251, Aug. 31, 2010.

Impact: Because of the ADA Amendments Act’s more expansive definition of a “disability,” employers should be aware that workers with cancer or other diseases that are inactive or in remission may still be considered disabled, in which case reasonable accommodations must be considered.

Workforce Management, November 2010, p. 11Subscribe Now!

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.


blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog


EEOC says that employers legally can offer incentives to employees to get vaccinated in almost all instances

If you’re an employer looking to get as many of your employees vaccinated as possible, you can rest eas...

ADA, CDC, COVID-19, EEOC, GINA, pandemic, vaccinated

workforce blog


Fixing some common misconceptions about HIPAA

Ever since the CDC amended its COVID-19 guidance to say that the fully vaccinated no longer need to wea...

COVID-19, health care, HIPAA, human resources, wellness

workforce blog


We are in the midst of a public mental health crisis; how employers can help

Do not ignore these issues or your employees who are living with them. Mental health illnesses are no d...

ADA, benefits, Coronavirus, FMLA, mental health, paid time off