Time & Attendance
By Staff Report
Jan. 7, 2011
Some 49 percent of companies don’t know what level of shareholder support of executive compensation in say-on-pay votes will be considered a successful outcome by their boards of directors, according to a Towers Watson & Co. survey released Jan. 5.
Of the 51 percent of companies that have defined how they will evaluate success, 19.6 percent say they believe that a favorable shareholder vote of at least 90 percent would be considered successful, while 37.2 percent say they believe a vote of at least 80 percent would be considered successful, 27.5 percent say they believe it needs to be a vote of at least 70 percent, 13.7 percent say they believe a vote of at least 60 percent, and 2 percent say they believe a vote of at least 50 percent, according to a Towers Watson written statement about the results.
Only 8 percent of companies surveyed have a process in place for “developing appropriate action plans in response to potential shareholder concerns” on executive compensation, the statement said.
Fifty-one percent of companies expect to hold annual shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation, while 39 percent prefer to hold the vote every three years and 10 percent every two years.
Some 48 percent of respondents “are making some adjustments to their executive pay-setting process in preparing for the upcoming proxy season,” the statement said. Those adjustments include more detailed explanations of compensation programs in SEC filings and changes in severance programs and high-profile perquisites.
Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted last year, companies have to conduct say-on-pay votes at least every three years but are allowed discretion on whether to hold annual, biennial or triennial votes, according to a Tower Watson statement on the survey results. The law requires companies to put the say-on-pay frequency question to a nonbinding shareholder vote at least every six years.
“The survey responses suggest that companies are struggling to understand the implications of say-on-pay votes, and many are taking a wait-and-see approach to measuring success,” said James Kroll, a Towers Watson senior consultant, in the statement.
Towers Watson surveyed 135 U.S. publicly traded companies in mid-December.
Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.
ComplianceMinimum Wage by State in 2023 – All You Need to Know
Summary Twenty-three states and D.C. raised their minimum wage rates in 2023, effective January 1. Thr...
federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance
ComplianceExempt vs. non-exempt employees: knowing the difference
Summary Employees are exempt from FLSA requirements when they meet specific exemption criteria based on...
Department of Labor, exempt employees, Misclassification, non-exempt employees
ComplianceCalifornia fast food workers bill: why it’s more than meets the eye and how to prepare
Summary: California signs bill establishing a “fast food council” that has the power to raise the indus...