Legal

California Court Rules Hidden Nighttime Camera Not a Privacy Violation

By Staff Report

Aug. 5, 2009


An employer did not violate employee privacy rights by installing a hidden camera aimed at catching a person viewing online pornography after business hours, California’s Supreme Court ruled.


The ruling in Abigail Hernandez et al. v. Hillsides Inc. et al. overturned a state appellate court’s finding that two employee plaintiffs in the case “suffered an intrusion into a protected zone of privacy that was so unjustified and offensive as to constitute a privacy violation.”


Hillsides operated a Pasadena, California, facility for neglected and abused children where the plaintiffs worked and shared an office, court records state.


In 2002, the facility’s director learned that at night, after the two plaintiffs left the premises, someone repeatedly used a computer in their shared office to view pornography. The director installed a hidden camera that was operated only at night after the plaintiffs left.


Nonetheless, the workers filed a tort claim after discovering the camera.


The employer argued it neither viewed nor recorded the employees, so it did not intrude on their privacy.


The California Supreme Court agreed.


While finding that the employees had a reasonable expectation that their employer would not record their activities on video, “any actual surveillance was drastically limited in nature and scope, exempting plaintiffs from its reach,” according to the court’s unanimous opinion.


The court also found that the company had a responsibility to protect the children for whom it was caring.



Filed by Roberto Ceniceros of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Compliance

Minimum Wage by State in 2022 – All You Need to Know

Summary The federal minimum wage rate is $7.25, but the rate is higher in 30 states, along with Washing...

federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance

workforce blog

Legal

California’s push for a 32-hour workweek explained, and how to prepare

Summary: California is considering a 32-hour workweek bill for businesses with over 500 staff 4 day wee...

32 hour workweek, 4 day workweek, california, legislature, overtime

workforce blog

Legal

A business owner’s guide to restaurant tipping law

Business owners in the restaurant industry are in a unique position when it comes to employee tips. As ...

restaurants, tip laws, tipping