Time & Attendance
By Staff Report
May. 16, 2011
A group of more than 6,000 black firefighter applicants has scored a court victory in a lawsuit raising questions about discrimination and employment-related testing.
On May 13, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in Chicago largely upheld an earlier ruling that the city had to pay damages and hire scores of black firefighter applicants because a job test had an unfair negative impact on them.
“After many years fighting for justice, our African-American clients will finally have a fair chance to serve their city,” says John Payton, director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. “The only remaining step is speedy implementation of a robust remedy for this long-standing injustice. The city of Chicago will be better for it. And beyond the immediate results in Chicago, this case will help ensure that no other fire department or employer utilizes a discriminatory test to unjustifiably eliminate fully qualified applicants of any race.”
From May 1996 through November 2001, the city hired 11 groups of applicants based on the results of an employment test. A lower court ruled that the cut-off score used by the city was not justified by business necessity. The city appealed, arguing that the initial charge of discrimination in the case was not filed in a timely manner with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The 7th Circuit court agreed with the city. But the U.S. Supreme Court reversed that decision, sending the case back to the appeals court.
Many organizations are turning to employment-related tests, in part, to establish hiring procedures that are objective and therefore legally defensible. But, as the Chicago case shows, tests can land employers in hot water, as well.
Come see what we’re building in the world of predictive employee scheduling, superior labor insights and next-gen employee apps. We’re on a mission to automate workforce management for hourly employees and bring productivity, optimization and engagement to the frontline.
ComplianceMinimum Wage by State in 2023 – All You Need to Know
Summary Twenty-three states and D.C. raised their minimum wage rates in 2023, effective January 1. Thr...
federal law, minimum wage, pay rates, state law, wage law compliance
HR AdministrationIs your employee attendance policy and procedure fit for purpose?
Summary: Lateness and absenteeism are early warning signs of a deteriorating attendance policy. — More ...
compliance, HR technology, human resources
HR AdministrationClawback provisions: A safety net against employee fraud losses
Summary Clawback provisions are usually included as clauses in employee contracts and are used to recou...
clawback provisions, human resources, policy