<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating Politicians Based on Management Ability</title>
	<link>http://workforce.com/wpmu/washington/2008/08/13/evaluating-politicians-based-on-management-ability/</link>
	<description>An insider's view of how legislation and government regulation influence workforce management.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://workforce.com/wpmu/washington/2008/08/13/evaluating-politicians-based-on-management-ability/#comment-10572</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://workforce.com/wpmu/washington/2008/08/13/evaluating-politicians-based-on-management-ability/#comment-10572</guid>
		<description>Effective communication and it's impact on credibilty (i.e. is one honest, competent, trustworthy, etc.) is an important facet of both leaders and managers.
To view the transcript and compare communication styles:
http://rickwarrennews.com/transcript/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Effective communication and it&#8217;s impact on credibilty (i.e. is one honest, competent, trustworthy, etc.) is an important facet of both leaders and managers.<br />
To view the transcript and compare communication styles:<br />
<a href="http://rickwarrennews.com/transcript/" rel="nofollow">http://rickwarrennews.com/transcript/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://workforce.com/wpmu/washington/2008/08/13/evaluating-politicians-based-on-management-ability/#comment-10569</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://workforce.com/wpmu/washington/2008/08/13/evaluating-politicians-based-on-management-ability/#comment-10569</guid>
		<description>"The efficacy of a campaign’s operation doesn’t ensure a victory for its candidate. McCain’s unorthodox town-hall style electioneering may work on a national scale. And he does poll higher than Obama on his commander-in-chief presence.  But for now, it looks as if Obama is the better manager, which may lead to his becoming CEO of the country."

How about their actual stances on the issues?  And what's up with the comment about "unorthodox town-hall style electioneering"?

I smell some bias here.

It is well known that John McCain is not very good at delivering prepared speeches from a teleprompter, but people resonate with him when he has a regular conversation on the issues themselves.  Why?  He's direct and decisive.  You know exactly where he stands.

It is also well known that Barack Obama is very good at delivering prepared speeches from a teleprompter, but often comes across as indecisive and skirting issues because of his halting style and roundabout answers.

For a clear example of both styles go back and watch (or read the transcript) their recent conversations with Rick Warren on CNN.

The contrast on both issues and style are clear.  Where they stand on the issues is obviously important.  But knowing where they stand comes down to communication.  And that is where style can help or hurt.  With politicians, most people prefer direct and decisive answers about what they believe and where they stand.

I predict McCain's direct and decisive answers in contrast to Obama's circuitous answers will have a much greater impact on the outcome of this election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The efficacy of a campaign’s operation doesn’t ensure a victory for its candidate. McCain’s unorthodox town-hall style electioneering may work on a national scale. And he does poll higher than Obama on his commander-in-chief presence.  But for now, it looks as if Obama is the better manager, which may lead to his becoming CEO of the country.&#8221;</p>
<p>How about their actual stances on the issues?  And what&#8217;s up with the comment about &#8220;unorthodox town-hall style electioneering&#8221;?</p>
<p>I smell some bias here.</p>
<p>It is well known that John McCain is not very good at delivering prepared speeches from a teleprompter, but people resonate with him when he has a regular conversation on the issues themselves.  Why?  He&#8217;s direct and decisive.  You know exactly where he stands.</p>
<p>It is also well known that Barack Obama is very good at delivering prepared speeches from a teleprompter, but often comes across as indecisive and skirting issues because of his halting style and roundabout answers.</p>
<p>For a clear example of both styles go back and watch (or read the transcript) their recent conversations with Rick Warren on CNN.</p>
<p>The contrast on both issues and style are clear.  Where they stand on the issues is obviously important.  But knowing where they stand comes down to communication.  And that is where style can help or hurt.  With politicians, most people prefer direct and decisive answers about what they believe and where they stand.</p>
<p>I predict McCain&#8217;s direct and decisive answers in contrast to Obama&#8217;s circuitous answers will have a much greater impact on the outcome of this election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
