<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making People Your Competitive Advantage—Just Lip Service for Most Companies?</title>
	<link>http://workforce.com/wpmu/books/2008/05/01/talent_people/</link>
	<description>Books@Work reviews books that are of interest to workforce management professionals.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  8 Aug 2008 01:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://workforce.com/wpmu/books/2008/05/01/talent_people/#comment-891</link>
		<author>Mark Stelzner</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://workforce.com/wpmu/books/2008/05/01/talent_people/#comment-891</guid>
		<description>Excellent summation Jessica, and I truly believe that Ed may be on to something with his analysis.  

I find the resistance to a 360 board member review to be a real issue, for the amount of liability assumed currently by board members in light of new reporting criteria has created a climate of risk aversion.  Thus, if the board were to fall under yet another level of performance-based scrutiny, the may elect to pass on participation.  Perhaps more important is that boards are typically made up of \</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent summation Jessica, and I truly believe that Ed may be on to something with his analysis.  </p>
<p>I find the resistance to a 360 board member review to be a real issue, for the amount of liability assumed currently by board members in light of new reporting criteria has created a climate of risk aversion.  Thus, if the board were to fall under yet another level of performance-based scrutiny, the may elect to pass on participation.  Perhaps more important is that boards are typically made up of \</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
