<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SHRM’s New CEO Pick: So Far, So Good</title>
	<link>http://workforce.com/wpmu/bizmgmt/2008/08/11/shrm_new_ceo_pick/</link>
	<description>All about the issues that arise when workforce issues converge with business management.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Bo C.</title>
		<link>http://workforce.com/wpmu/bizmgmt/2008/08/11/shrm_new_ceo_pick/#comment-27576</link>
		<author>Bo C.</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://workforce.com/wpmu/bizmgmt/2008/08/11/shrm_new_ceo_pick/#comment-27576</guid>
		<description>John, 
Ordinarily I agree with your judgment, however in this case I am not sure that your hope is well placed.
Regardless of how good a CEO is, if the board is dysfunctional or misaligned, the only thing that will happen with a good CEO is that he or she will get frustrated and quit or create further division and dysfunction within the board by creating sides.
I believe that your statement below says it all and the CEO is only a part of that!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
Ordinarily I agree with your judgment, however in this case I am not sure that your hope is well placed.<br />
Regardless of how good a CEO is, if the board is dysfunctional or misaligned, the only thing that will happen with a good CEO is that he or she will get frustrated and quit or create further division and dysfunction within the board by creating sides.<br />
I believe that your statement below says it all and the CEO is only a part of that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
