Benefits

U.S. Awaits Supreme Court’s Ruling on Health Care Reform Law

By Jerry Geisel

Jun. 22, 2012

The eyes of the nation will be on the U.S. Supreme Court next week, waiting for it to hand down its ruling on the legality of the 2010 landmark health care reform law.

Three months after the justices heard oral arguments on a challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by 26 Republican state attorneys general, the high court will rule sometime next week as its 2011-2012 term comes to a close.

The suspense will end with the Supreme Court decision that is widely expected to go in one of three directions:

• The justices will strike down the law’s individual mandate, which will require most U.S. residents to enroll in a qualified health care plan or pay a financial penalty starting in 2014.

• The justices will allow the individual mandate to stand.

• The justices will strike down the individual mandate and with it the full law.

If the entire law is struck down, the result—at least in the short run—will be mass uncertainty, benefit experts say.

For example, employers and other early retiree health care plan sponsors will want to know if they will have to return $5 billion in claims reimbursement they received from a program created by the health care reform law.

Similarly, employers will need to know if coverage they extended—to comply with a health care reform law mandate—to employees’ adult children up to age 26 is retroactively taxable.

Employers’ “immediate concerns have to do with the fact that they have implemented some of those provisions,” said Paul Dennett, senior vp-health care reform at the American Benefits Council in Washington.

In the event that the entire law is overturned, employers would need to decide whether they want to keep reform law mandates such as the adult child coverage, full coverage of preventive services, and no annual or lifetime dollar limits on essential services.

States also would face issues such as whether they would want to continue setting up insurance exchanges as required by the reform law.

Jerry Geisel writes for Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Jerry Geisel writes for Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management.

About Workforce.com

blog workforce

We build robust scheduling & attendance software for businesses with 500+ frontline workers. With custom BI reporting and demand-driven scheduling, we help our customers reduce labor spend and increase profitability across their business. It's as simple as that.

Book a call
See the software

Related Articles

workforce blog

Benefits

EEOC says that employers legally can offer incentives to employees to get vaccinated in almost all instances

If you’re an employer looking to get as many of your employees vaccinated as possible, you can rest eas...

ADA, CDC, COVID-19, EEOC, GINA, pandemic, vaccinated

workforce blog

Benefits

Fixing some common misconceptions about HIPAA

Ever since the CDC amended its COVID-19 guidance to say that the fully vaccinated no longer need to wea...

COVID-19, health care, HIPAA, human resources, wellness

workforce blog

Benefits

We are in the midst of a public mental health crisis; how employers can help

Do not ignore these issues or your employees who are living with them. Mental health illnesses are no d...

ADA, benefits, Coronavirus, FMLA, mental health, paid time off