Workforce Blogs
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Find A Job
Post A Job



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


Blog: The Business of Management
 

April 18th, 2008

Why Guns at Work Are a Bad Idea

Are guns at work ever a good idea? Most sensible people would quickly say no, but good sense sometimes gets sidetracked, as it recently did in Florida.

Earlier this week, Gov. Charlie Christ signed a bill “that will allow Florida residents to keep guns locked in their cars at work.” The new law doesn’t take effect until July, and will likely be challenged in court, but according to a story in The Miami Herald,  “Under the new law, businesses cannot prohibit employees or customers from keeping a legally owned gun locked inside their cars, as long as the owner has a permit to carry a concealed weapon.”

Businesses in Florida are worried—rightly, I think—that letting workers have easy access to firearms in the workplace is not a good idea. In fact, both the Florida Chamber of Commerce and the Florida Retail Federation have hired legal counsel to sue the state over the new law.

We’ve written before about the Florida debate over guns in the workplace, and also about the how the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver ruled that there was no right in Oklahoma to have access to a firearm at work, so this isn’t a new issue. What is new is that Florida seems to be well on its way to joining Alaska, Georgia, Kentucky and Mississippi as states where the potential for workplace violence just got kicked up quite a few notches.

Carl Hiaasen, the great novelist and Miami Herald columnist, had his own unique perspective on the issue. “After years of wimping around, Florida lawmakers finally passed a law that will allow you to bring your favorite firearm to work, providing you leave it locked in your vehicle,” he wrote.

“In the past, deranged employees who wanted to mow down their boss and colleagues had to drive all the way home to fetch their guns. It was the waste of a perfectly good lunch hour, not to mention the gasoline,” he added.  “Soon, however, any simmering paranoid with a concealed-weapons permit will legally be able to take his firearms to work. If a supervisor rebukes him for surfing porn sites, or a co-worker makes fun of his mismatched socks, he can simply stroll out to the parking lot and retrieve his Glock or AK-47 (or both) to settle the grievance.”

I can see Hiaasen’s point, and it hits home to me because I used to work with a guy who did a lot of hunting who just happened to carry his rifle in the trunk of his car—that he drove to work. He wasn’t a bad guy, but he could get angry and scary on occasion, and that’s not a good combination for someone packing heat in their car.

My guess is that Florida’s new gun legislation, dubbed the “Disgruntled Workers’ Speedy Revenge & Retaliation Law” by Hiaasen, will get held up for a few years, or more, as the courts work it out. Maybe more sensible heads will prevail in the end—at least I hope so. But I’m not holding my breath. After all, Florida is a state where many people still haven’t figured out how to vote. And that doesn’t give me confidence that they will figure out why guns in the workplace just makes no sense at all.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://workforce.com/wpmu/bizmgmt/2008/04/18/guns_at_work/trackback/



Comments

On one side of the issue is a valid distinction on what businesses can restrict on their private property.
On the other side is a constitutional right.
Looking at the facts… registered concealed carry are the lowest crime segment of society. People will carry firearms in their vehicles regardless of company policy.
This article doesn’t present any facts, just a knee jerk reaction based on a simplistic hypothesis that firearms turn people into raving lunatics.
The question is how to handle this. Employees are insulted by the caricature of this and other articles. Yet there is a valid question regarding private property rights. How do you craft company policy to deal with these legal requirements but still preserve company rights?

Yet one more example that what was once considered “common” sense is perhaps not so common after all…

The obligation for Businesses to protect its employees safety must trump the rights of individuals to own and carry a concealed weapon. We must rule on the side of caution.

The only possible case for allowing employees to conceal a weapon in their car at work is to allow for a more even playing field in the event of some type of shooting rampage (i.e. Virginia Tech). Companies must decide on an individual basis how to best protect its employees in the rare event some type of violent event occurs at the workplace. This may include hiring a security guard to carry a weapon, restricting building entry, conducting background checks on its employees.

However, allowing every employee to have their own weapon can’t be the best solution.


Post a comment

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)

You must read and type the 5 chars within 0..9 and A..F, and submit the form.

  

Please, generate a





Blog Index







Recent Posts

Blog Archives

Categories



Recent Comments

Other Workforce Blogs

Blog Roll







Copyright © 1995-2007 Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement