Legal Insight
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Find A Job
Post A Job



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


Feature:

No Claim for Failure to Accommodate

  

Feature Contents

1. Dispatcher Has No ADA or FMLA Claim
Employers should rely on opinions and recommendations of health care providers in considering possible accommodations, as well as in determining if an employee has the ability to perform essential job functions.

2. ADA Accommodation and FMLA Claims
Employers must engage in an interactive process with employees seeking accommodation for a disability or leave under the FMLA. By James E. Hall, Mark T. Kobata and Marty Denis


Similar Documents

Related Topics



Sponsored Tools

Discover PCRecruiter HR Solutions
Web-Based HR Solutions Used By Organizations Worldwide. Schedule a Demo Now!


Eliminate performance review headaches
Free eGuide: Learn the secret of more effective, no-hassle performance reviews


Quickly Comply with HR Regulations using TriNet
Total HR solutions designed for growing companies; Serving the U.S. and Canada.


HR Management Certification
100% Online Certificate Programs Choose a School & Request Free Info


Discriminatory Harassment Prevention
Online training that incorporates your policy, your message and your brand.


Get Listed >>>

 



No Claim for Failure to Accommodate


Employers are advised to engage in an interactive process with employees seeking job accommodation. The Americans with Disabilities Act does not require employers to accommodate employees by assigning other workers to take over the duties of a disabled employee.
By James E. Hall, Mark T. Kobata and Marty Denis
Comments 0 | Recommend 0

ouglas Quinney worked as an account manager for Swire Coca-Cola USA in Draper, Utah. Driving was an essential function of Quinney’s duties as an account manager. During his employment, Quinney suffered back pain and he took several prescription medications, including Lorcet, Oxycontin, Soma and Duagesic patches to relieve his pain. In December 2001, after hearing from one of Quinney’s co-workers that Quinney was overusing his pain medication, Swire asked Quinney to take a drug test in accordance with its drug and alcohol policy. Because Quinney tested positive for hydrocodone, Swire’s medical review officer concluded that Quinney should not operate a company vehicle while taking pain medication. Quinney was placed on paid leave. He was told to stop using narcotic pain relievers or he could not return to work as an account manager. Quinney was given short-term disability.

     In June 2002, Quinney filed a discrimination charge against Swire, alleging that all the drugs for which he tested positive were prescribed by his doctor and that he could not stop taking them. In July and August 2002, Swire met with Quinney four times to offer him jobs that did not involve driving and for which he was qualified. Quinney did not accept any of these four jobs and quit.

     Quinney filed suit in US District Court in Utah, alleging that Swire violated the Americans with Disabilities Act because it failed to accommodate his disability. Granting summary judgment and dismissing his claims, the district court found that driving was an essential function of his job, and that Swire did not have to continue to employ Quinney. The court found it “entirely proper for Swire to rely on the opinions of its medical professionals” in determining that Quinney could not drive safely. Quinney v. Swire Coca-Cola USA, D. Utah, No. 2:07-cv-788 (05/18/09).

     Impact: Employers are advised to engage in an interactive process with employees seeking job accommodation. The ADA does not require employers to accommodate employees by assigning other employees to take over the duties of a disabled employee.

Workforce Management Online, June 2009 -- Register Now!

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.


James E. Hall, Mark T. Kobata and Marty Denis are partners in the law firm of Barlow, Kobata & Denis, with offices in Los Angleles and Chicago. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Features Archive

           
E-mail this document Printer-friendly version Write to the Editor Reprint Information

Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.


Comments

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.








Copyright © 1995-2009 Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement