Legal Insight
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Find A Job
Post A Job



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


Feature:

Dealing With a More Union-Friendly World

  

Feature Contents
Top of Feature

1. The Three Biggest Blunders Dealing With Unions
With card-check legislation on the horizon, employers need to open up communication with their workers now more than ever.

2. Dissecting Pros, Cons of Card-Check Legislation


3. Likely Business Targets Brace for Organizing Push From Unions
If the Employee Free Choice Act becomes law, ‘hotels, restaurants, any kind of industry where mobility is not an option will be forced to deal with wage rigidity and job rigidity.’

4. Tips From the Trenches
‘You have to educate yourself,’ says the owner of a landscaping company that was shut out of a job site because her firm wasn’t unionized. Christy Webber panicked and agreed to contracts with two unions that wanted to sign her employees.

5. Unionization Loopholes? They’re Tight
With ‘card check’ top of mind, some opponents have dug up an old National Labor Relations Board regulation and claimed that many small businesses are exempt from union activity. That’s not necessarily true.


Similar Documents

Related Topics



Sponsored Tools

PCRecruiter Recruitment Solutions
Discover PCRecruiter, Applicant Tracking Solutions Used Worldwide.


Take the Pain Out of Performance Reviews
Free eGuide: Make performance reviews easier — and much more effective


Comply with HR Regulations Easily by using TriNet
PEO solutions for a tough economy: request a free info kit! Serving the US and Canada since 1988.


HR Management Certification
Choose a School, Request More Info, Start Earning Your Certification!


Top-Rated CPR/First Aid Training
Establish an In-house Training Center. High Quality. Sign Up Now & Save 30%.


Get Listed >>>

 



Dissecting Pros, Cons of Card-Check Legislation


The election of President Barack Obama has turned the spotlight on a proposed law to reshape how unions are formed. Two Washington, D.C., labor law experts with opposing views on the Employee Free Choice Act discuss how life might change if it becomes law.
By Amy Lee
Comments 0 | Recommend 0

he election of President Barack Obama has turned the spotlight on a proposed law to reshape how unions are formed.

    Obama backs the Employee Free Choice Act, which would make it easier for workers to form a union. EFCA also imposes stiffer cash penalties on employers that interfere with organizing efforts or illegally stall initial contract negotiations. Crain’s Chicago Business asked two Washington, D.C., labor law experts with opposing views on EFCA to discuss how life might change if it becomes law.

    Josh Goldstein is a spokesman for American Rights at Work, a nonprofit, union-funded lobbying group that supports EFCA.

    Crain’s Chicago Business: Is there anything wrong with the current process?
    Josh Goldstein: The law today too heavily favors the employer. Management can force workers who have already indicated their desire to form a union to take an extra step and hold an election, which gives them time to harass, intimidate and even fire individuals seeking union representation. And the penalties for interfering with the union formation or contract negotiations are so insignificant they are laughable.

    Crain’s: Does this bill take away the right of workers to hold an election to determine whether to form a union?
    Goldstein: No, not at all. That’s one of the myths opponents of this law would love for you to believe, but it’s not true. Workers will still have the right to request an election by signing a card indicating a desire to hold an election. The difference is that neither the National Labor Relations Board nor the employer can force an election on them. If workers sign a petition indicating their desire to have an election, then the NLRB can call an election; but if a majority want union representation and indicate that on a card, they will not be forced to go through that additional step of holding an election. EFCA gives workers the right to call an election, not management.

    Crain’s: Even if EFCA doesn’t pass, do you think the Obama administration is likely to foster a more union-friendly environment?
    Goldstein: We’re under new leadership in Congress and the White House, and both are committed to workers’ rights. People voted for leadership who can help to elevate a struggling middle class.

    J. Justin Wilson is managing director of the Center for Union Facts, a lobbying group funded primarily by corporations. The group opposes EFCA.

    Crain’s: Why is this bill garnering so much attention right now?
    J. Justin Wilson: Labor unions are looking to swell their ranks and their war chest. They spent $450 million in this election, and there was really only one string attached: the Employee Free Choice Act. The stars are aligned for them right now with a Democratic House and Senate and Democratic president, and they know they are in reach of it.

    Crain’s: Is there anything wrong with the current process?
    Wilson: The process used today… ensures American workers have the right to vote their conscience in a secret ballot, and that ensures the process is democratic. Unions know that it’s much easier to get people to sign a card than to get them to vote in an election, so it’s clear that this bill was introduced because they have no intention of using the NLRB process ever again. The bottom line is, every worker should have the right to vote.

    Crain’s: Does this bill take away the right of workers to hold an election to determine whether to form a union?
    Wilson: Is there a loophole that would allow an election? Yes. Would that loophole ever be used? It’s very, very unlikely. The bill explicitly says that if they turn in 51 percent of cards [saying yes to unionizing], the NLRB is explicitly prohibited from having an election.

    Crain’s: Even if EFCA doesn’t pass, do you think the Obama administration is likely to foster a more union-friendly environment?
    Wilson: What we see happening … is more and more tweaks around the edges that favor labor unions. … It’s a litany of things small-business owners will have to hire lawyers to help them comply with and that expose them to a greater degree of liability.

Workforce Management Online, March 2009Register Now!


Amy Lee is a reporter for Crain’s Chicago Business, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
Next Article: 3. Likely Business Targets Brace for Organizing Push From Unions
If the Employee Free Choice Act becomes law, ‘hotels, restaurants, any kind of industry where mobility is not an option will be forced to deal with wage rigidity and job rigidity.’

Top of Feature | Features Archive

           
E-mail this document Printer-friendly version Write to the Editor Reprint Information

Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.


Comments

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.








Copyright © 1995-2009 Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement